Page 69 - The davide court : บทบาทของศาลยุติธรรมกับความเป็นธรรมด้านเพศภาวะในการพิจารณาพิพากษาคดี

Davide Court : ∫∑∫“∑¢Õß»“≈¬ÿµ‘∏√√¡°—∫§«“¡‡ªìπ∏√√¡¥â“π‡æ»¿“«–„π°“√æ‘®“√≥“æ‘æ“°…“§¥’ 67

52
§”æ‘æ“°…“§¥’¥—ß°≈à“«¢â“ßµâπ °“√ªØ‘√Ÿª¢âÕ∫—ߧ—∫¢Õß»“≈ ·ºπ‡°’ˬ«°—∫‡æ»¿“«–·≈–°“√æ—≤π“
(Gender and Development Plan) ·≈–§≥–°√√¡°“√«à“¥â«¬°“√µÕ∫ πÕ߇™‘ß¡‘µ‘∑“߇滿“«–

„πΩÉ“¬µÿ≈“°“√· ¥ß„Àâ‡ÀÁπ·π«‚πâ¡∑’ˉ¡àÕ“®¬âÕπ°≈—∫µàÕ°“√§”π÷ß∂÷ß¡‘µ‘∑“߇滿“«–„π∞“π–∑’ˇªìππ‚¬∫“¬
∂“∫—π¢Õß»“≈Æ’°“ ¥â«¬§«“¡À«—߇ªìπÕ¬à“߬‘Ëß«à“ ‡¡◊ËÕ¡“µ√°“√µà“ßÊ ‡À≈à“π’ȇ°‘¥¢÷Èπ À≈—°°“√∑—ÈßÀ≈“¬∑’ˇªìπ
Õÿª √√§µàÕ§«“¡¬ÿµ‘∏√√¡∑“߇滿“«– ¥—߇™àπ∑’ˇ§¬ª√“°Ø§”æ‘æ“°…“„𧥒 People of the Philippines
vs. Relox ·≈–§¥’ People of the Philippines vs. Salarza ®–‰¡à‡°‘¥¢÷ÈπÕ’°µàÕ‰ª

®“°°“√»÷°…“§”æ‘æ“°…“µà“ßÊ ∑’ˇ°‘¥¢÷Èπ„π™à«ß«“√–°“√¥”√ßµ”·ÀπàߢÕߪ√–∏“π»“≈Æ’°“¥“«‘‡¥
· ¥ß„Àâ‡ÀÁπ«à“ ºŸâ π—∫ πÿ𧫓¡‡ ¡Õ¿“§∑“߇滿“«–∑’ˇ¢Á¡·¢Áß°«à“‰¥â·°àºŸâæ‘æ“°…“ µ√’„π»“≈ Ÿß∑—ÈßÀ≈“¬
·πàπÕπ«à“ ¿Ÿ¡‘À≈—ß à«π∫ÿ§§≈·≈–°“√√—∫√Ÿâ„πª√–‡¥Áπ∑“߇滿“«–¬àÕ¡¡’Õ‘∑∏‘æ≈Õ¬à“ß¡“°µàÕ°“√§”π÷ß∂÷ß

ª√–‡¥Á𧫓¡‡ ¡Õ¿“§∑“߇滿“«–¢ÕߺŸâæ‘æ“°…“»“≈ Ÿß ‡√“ “¡“√∂§“¥‡¥“‰¥â«à“¢âÕÕâ“ßÕ‘ß∂÷ß CEDAW
¢ÕߺŸâæ‘æ“°…“‚√‡¡‚√ (Justice Remero) „𧥒 Romualdez-Marcos vs. Commission on Elections
53
(§≥–°√√¡°“√°“√‡≈◊Õ°µ—Èß) ·≈–§«“¡‡ÀÁπ·¬âßÕ¬à“ß√ÿπ·√ߢÕß∑à“π„𧥒 De La Cruz vs. Judge
54
Concepcion ‡ªìπº≈¡“®“°°“√‡¢â“√à«¡ª√–™ÿ¡√–¥—∫π“π“™“µ‘„π‡√◊ËÕß·≈–°“√¡’ à«π√à«¡„π°‘®°√√¡µà“ßÊ
∑’ˇ°’ˬ«¢âÕß°—∫ ‘∑∏‘∑“߇滿“«–

§«“¡√‘‡√‘Ë¡„π°“√ªØ‘√Ÿª¢Õߪ√–∏“π»“≈Æ’°“¥“«‘‡¥„Àâ¡’°“√§”π÷ß∂÷߇滿“«–„πΩÉ“¬µÿ≈“°“√
‡æ‘Ë¡¡“°¢÷Èππ—Èπ π—∫«à“‡ªìπ∫∑∫“∑∑’Ë‚¥¥‡¥àπ∑’Ë∑”„À⧫“¡¬ÿµ‘∏√√¡∑“߇滿“«–°≈“¬‡ªìπ à«πÀπ÷ËߢÕß√–∫∫

µÿ≈“°“√ ‡π◊ËÕß®“°ΩÉ“¬µÿ≈“°“√°√–∑”°“√ºà“π∑“ß∫ÿ§≈“°√ ‡™àπ ≈à“¡„π»“≈ ºŸâ∫—π∑÷°™«‡≈¢ ‡ ¡’¬π»“≈
π—°«‘®—¬°ÆÀ¡“¬ ·≈–∑’Ë ”§—≠∑’Ë ÿ¥§◊Õ ºŸâæ‘æ“°…“ (judges) ·≈–ºŸâæ‘æ“°…“»“≈ Ÿß (justices) °√–∫«π°“√
‡™‘ß ∂“∫—π‡æ◊ËÕ„À⇰‘¥°“√§”π÷ß∂÷ß¡‘µ‘∑“߇滿“«–„πΩÉ“¬µÿ≈“°“√∂◊Õ«à“¡’§«“¡®”‡ªìπÕ¬à“߬‘Ëß„π°“√ √â“ß

52
¢âÕ∫—ߧ—∫«à“¥â«¬°“√µ√«® Õ∫欓π‡¥Á° (Rule on Examination of A Child Witness) (A.M. No. 00-4-07-SC,
December 15, 2000); ¢âÕ∫—ߧ—∫«à“¥â«¬°“√·∂≈ß∂÷ߧ«“¡‡ªìπ‚¡¶–¢Õß°“√ ¡√ ·≈–°“√∫Õ°≈â“ß°“√ ¡√ ∑’ˇªìπ‚¡¶’¬–
(Rule on Declaration of Absolute Nullity of Void Marriages and Annulment of Voidable Marriages) (A.M.
No.02-11-10-SC, March 15, 2003); √à“ߢâÕ‡ πÕ¢ÕߢâÕ∫—ߧ—∫«à“¥â«¬°“√·¬°°—πÕ¬Ÿàµ“¡°ÆÀ¡“¬ (Proposed Rule

on Legal Separation (A.M. No. 02-11-11-SC, May 1, 2003); ¢âÕ∫—ߧ—∫«à“¥â«¬ºŸâ·∑π‚¥¬™Õ∫∏√√¡¢ÕߺŸâ‡¬“«å
(Rule on Guardianship of Minors) (A.M. No. 03-02-05-SC, May 1, 2003); ¢âÕ∫—ߧ—∫«à“¥â«¬Õ”𓮪°§√Õß
¢ÕߺŸâ‡¬“«å·≈–À¡“¬ —Ëß„Àâ àßµ—«ºŸâ∂Ÿ°§ÿ¡¢—ß¡“»“≈∑’ˇ°’ˬ«¢âÕß°—∫Õ”π“®ª°§√ÕߢÕߺŸâ‡¬“«å (Rule on Custody of Minors
and Writ of Habeas Corpus in Relation to Custody of Minors) (A.M. No. 03-04-04-SC, May 15, 2003);

¢âÕ∫—ߧ—∫«à“¥â«¬§«“¡√ÿπ·√ß∑’Ë°√–∑”µàÕ µ√’·≈–∫ÿµ√¢Õß µ√’ (Rule on Violence Against Women and Their
Children) (A.M. No. 04-10-11-SC, November 15, 2004); ¢âÕ∫—ߧ—∫«à“¥â«¬°√–∫«π°“√∑“ß«‘𗬄𧥒
°“√§ÿ°§“¡∑“߇滷≈–·π«ªØ‘∫—µ‘«à“¥â«¬°“√ª√–惵‘µπ∑’ˇÀ¡“– ¡„π∑’Ë∑”ß“π¢ÕßΩÉ“¬µÿ≈“°“√ (Rule on
Administrative Procedure in Sexual Harassment Cases and Guidelines on Proper Work Decorum

in the Judiciary (A.M. No. 03-03-13-SC, December 14, 2004)
53
G.R. No. 119976, September 18, 1995.
54
Õâ“ß·≈â«„π‡™‘ßÕ√√∂∑’Ë 47