Page 86 - เพศภาวะกับศาลยุติธรรม : กรณีศึกษาจากฟิลิปปินส์

Engendering the Philippine Judiciary : ‡æ»¿“«–°—∫»“≈¬ÿμ‘∏√√¡ °√≥’»÷°…“®“°øî≈‘ªªîπ å
84

37
CEDAW ¡“μ√“ 5
38
CEDAW ·≈–¢âÕ‡ πÕ·π–∑—Ë«‰ª ∑’Ë 19 ‡√◊ËÕߧ«“¡√ÿπ·√ßμàÕºŸâÀ≠‘ß ¡“μ√“ 2.
39
¥Ÿ http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/
40
Aurora Javate de Dios, çThe continuing Struggle for Womenûs Human Rights and Empowerment,é address
delivered before the Womenûs Studies Association of the Philippines, Philippine Womenûs University,
May 31, 2005.
41
Jane Connors, çWhat Is an Optional Protocol?é UN Division for the Advancement of Women, December 20,
2000.
42
‡æ‘ËßÕâ“ß
43
æ‘∏’ “√‡≈◊Õ°√—∫ (Optional Protocol) ¢ÕßÕπÿ —≠≠“ CEDAW ‡√‘Ë¡¡’º≈∫—ߧ—∫„™â‡¡◊ËÕ«—π∑’Ë 22 ∏—𫓧¡ §.». 2000
·≈–‡¡◊ËÕπ—∫∂÷ß«—π∑’Ë 3 ¡‘∂ÿπ“¬π 2005 ¡’√—∞∫“≈∑’ˉ¥â√à«¡≈ßπ“¡‡ªìπ¿“§’¢Õßæ‘∏’ “√‡≈◊Õ°√—∫π’È·≈â« ‡ªìπ®”π«π 70 ª√–‡∑».
44
¥Ÿ¢âÕ¡Ÿ≈°“√∑”ß“π¢ÕßÕπÿ —≠≠“ CEDAW ‡æ‘Ë¡‡μ‘¡‰¥â„π CEDAW çProgress Achieved in the Implementation of
the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women,é ´÷Ë߇ªìπ√“¬ß“π°“√ª√–™ÿ¡
‡¡◊ËÕ«—π∑’Ë 4-15 °—𬓬π 1995.
45
°≈‰°¢Õßæ‘∏’ “√‡≈◊Õ°√—∫¢ÕßÕπÿ —≠≠“ CEDAW π’È ‰¥â√—∫°“√ π—∫ πÿπÕ¬à“ß·¢Áߢ—π®“°°≈ÿà¡À√◊ÕÕߧå°√ºŸâÀ≠‘ß
‡æ√“–‡ªìπ°≈‰°∑’Ë∑”„Àâ¡’°“√∫—ߧ—∫„™âÕπÿ —≠≠“ CEDAW ‰¥âÕ¬à“ß¡’ª√– ‘∑∏‘¿“欑Ëߢ÷Èπ ‚¥¬°“√„ÀâÕ”π“®·°à§≥–°√√¡°“√
CEDAW „π°“√√—∫æ‘®“√≥“¢âÕ√âÕ߇√’¬π®“°ºŸâÀ≠‘ß∑’Ë∂Ÿ°≈–‡¡‘¥·≈–¥”‡π‘π°“√μà“ß Ê ∑’ˇ°’ˬ«¢âÕß
46
Committee on International Human Rights Law and Practice, Interim Report on the Impact of the Work of
Human Rights Treaty Bodies on National Courts and Tribunals (New Delhi: International Law Association,
2002), p. 3.
47
Inter-Parliamentary Union, The convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against
Women and its Optional Protocol Handbook for Parliamentarinas (Switzerland: United Nations, 2003), pp.
40-46.
48
‡æ‘ËßÕâ“ß
49
Committee on International Human Rights Law and Practice, p. 6.
50
‡æ‘ËßÕâ“ß, p. 14.
51
√—∞∏√√¡πŸ≠øî≈‘ªªîπ å ¡“μ√“ 2 (1987)
52
Shanti Dairiam, çImpact of the Convention at the Domestic Levelé CEDAW at 25: Are We Moving Forward?
(New York: United Nations, 2004), p. 4.
53
‡æ‘ËßÕâ“ß
54
°ÆÀ¡“¬ “∏“√≥√—∞ ∑’Ë 7192, a.k.a. °ÆÀ¡“¬ μ√’„π°“√æ—≤π“·≈–°“√ √â“ß™“μ‘ “∏“√≥√—∞øî≈‘ªªîπ å °ÿ¡¿“æ—π∏å §.».
1996.
55
‡æ‘ËßÕâ“ß
56
‡æ‘ËßÕâ“ß
57
‡æ‘ËßÕâ“ß
58
„π∫√√¥“ºŸâ√âÕ߇√’¬π„𧥒π’È ‡∫Õ√å𓇥μμå §“∫“≈§«‘π‚μ ∂Ÿ°∫—ߧ—∫„À⇰…’¬≥Õ“¬ÿß“π„π√–À«à“ß∑’˧¥’¬—߉¡à ‘Èπ ÿ¥
·≈–·¡â®–¡’§” —Ëß»“≈‰μà à«π√–¥—∫¿“§„Àâæ—°°“√∫—ߧ—∫„™â¢âÕμ°≈ßπ’ȇªìπ°“√™—Ë«§√“« ·≈–μàÕ¡“°Á‰¥â¡’§” —Ëß√–ß—∫°“√„™â
¢âÕμ°≈ߥ—ß°≈à“«‡ªìπ°“√∂“«√°Áμ“¡ ‚¥¬ √ÿª ¡’‡®â“Àπâ“∑’Ë “¬°“√∫‘πÀ≠‘ß∑’ˉ¥â√—∫º≈°√–∑∫®“°¡“μ√°“√∑’ˇ≈◊Õ°ªØ‘∫—μ‘
μ“¡∑’˪√“°Ø„π¢âÕμ°≈ß°“√μàÕ√Õß√à«¡ (CBA) π’È ‡ªìπ®”π«πª√–¡“≥ 560 §π
59
»“≈‰μà «π√–¥—∫¿“§ª√–®”‡¡◊Õß¡“°“μ‘ “¢“∑’Ë 147 §¥’·æàß∑’Ë 04-886 ‡√◊ËÕß §”√âÕߢէ«“¡™à«¬‡À≈◊Õ·≈–¢Õ„Àâ
ÕÕ°§” —Ëߧÿ⡧√Õß
60
ºŸâæ‘æ“°…“‚√‡¡‚√‰¥â‡¢’¬π§«“¡‡ÀÁπ π—∫ πÿπ‰«â‡¡◊ËÕªï 1995 „𧥒 Marcos vs. COMELEC and Cirilo Roy Montejo
(G.R. No. 119976, September 18, 1995) ´÷Ëßπ—∫‡ªìπ§√—Èß·√°∑’Ë¡’°“√Õâ“ß∂÷ßÕπÿ —≠≠“ CEDAW „π§”μ—¥ ‘π¢Õß»“≈Æ’°“
·¡â®–‡ªìπ‡æ’¬ß°“√√–∫ÿ‰«â„𧫓¡‡ÀÁπ‡ √‘¡∑’Ë·¬°μà“ßÀ“°®“°§”μ—¥ ‘πÀ≈—°°Áμ“¡