Page 21 - เพศภาวะกับศาลยุติธรรม : กรณีศึกษาจากฟิลิปปินส์
P. 21

Engendering the Philippine Judiciary : ‡æ»¿“«–°—∫»“≈¬ÿμ‘∏√√¡ °√≥’»÷°…“®“°øî≈‘ªªîπ å
                                                                                                          19






                           ·π«∑“ß„π°“√À≈’°‡≈’ˬ߰“√· ¥ßÕÕ°´÷ËßÕ§μ‘∑“߇滿“«–Õ’°ª√–°“√Àπ÷Ëß§◊Õ°“√√–∫ÿ‡æ»¢Õß∫ÿ§§≈
                  ‡™àπ‰¡à§«√∫√√¬“¬«à“ç∑𓬧«“¡À≠‘ßé À√◊Õ ç·æ∑¬åÀ≠‘ßé À√◊Õ ç‡≈¢“πÿ°“√™“¬é ‡æ√“–„π°“√∫√√¬“¬

                  ‡™àππ—Èπ¡’π—¬¢Õß°“√„Àâ§«“¡‡ªìπæ‘‡»…°—∫‡æ»«à“ª°μ‘¡‘„™àμ”·ÀπàߢÕ߇滥—ß°≈à“«


                                                                                             9
                           °“√‡≈à“‡√◊ËÕßμ≈°∑’Ë¡’π—¬∑“߇滄πÀâÕßæ‘®“√≥“ À√◊Õ∑’ˇ√’¬°°—π«à“‡ªìπ dirty jokes  °“√查∑’Ë¡’
                  π—¬∑“߇滷≈–§”∂“¡μ√ßÊ ‡√◊ËÕ߇滰—∫‡®â“Àπâ“∑’ËÀ≠‘ߢÕß»“≈‰¥â∑”„ÀâºŸâæ‘æ“°…“„π√—∞·§≈‘øÕ√å‡π’¬
                  ∂Ÿ°∂Õ¥∂Õπ¡“·≈â« 10



                           ∑”‰¡®÷ßμâÕ߇πâπ‡√◊ËÕß°“√„™â¿“…“„πÀâÕßæ‘®“√≥“§¥’ °Á‡æ√“–¿“…“‡ªìπ‡§√◊ËÕß¡◊Õ∑’Ë¡’æ≈—ß∑’Ë ÿ¥

                  ¡’§«“¡À¡“¬‰ª‰°≈°«à“ ‘Ëß∑’˪√“°ØÕÕ°¡“ ¿“…“¡’Õ‘∑∏‘æ≈μàÕ‡®μ§μ‘ æƒμ‘°√√¡·≈–°“√√—∫√Ÿâ ∂âÕ¬§”
                  ·≈–«≈’μà“ßÊ ∑’Ë¡’Õ§μ‘∑“߇滿“«–∑”„À⺟âÀ≠‘ßμË”μâÕ¬≈¥§ÿ≥§à“ ‡ªìπ°“√ √ÿªÕ¬à“ߺ‘¥Ê ‰¡à‡ªìπ∏√√¡
                  ·≈–∑”„Àâ°“√‡À¡“√«¡∑’ËÕ—πμ√“¬¥”√ßÕ¬Ÿà¬◊𬓫·≈–𔉪 Ÿà°“√ªØ‘∫—μ‘μàÕÕ¬à“߉¡à‡ ¡Õ¿“§



                           ∫∑∫“∑¢Õßμÿ≈“°“√„π∞“π–∑’ˇªìπºŸâª√– “∑§«“¡¬ÿμ‘∏√√¡·≈–§«“¡‡ ¡Õ¿“§μâÕ߇ªìπ°“√ªØ‘∫—μ‘
                  μàÕ∫ÿ§§≈∑ÿ°§π¥â«¬§«“¡‡§“√æ·≈–§”π÷ß∂÷ß»—°¥‘Ï»√’¢Õ߇¢“ °“√„™â∂âÕ¬§”∑’˪√“»®“°Õ§μ‘∑”„À⇰‘¥

                  §«“¡¡—Ëπ„®„π¡ÿ¡¡Õߥâ“π‡æ»¿“«–«à“ºŸâæ‘æ“°…“∫√√≈ÿ∂÷ß∫∑∫“∑¢ÕߺŸâª√– “∑§«“¡¬ÿμ‘∏√√¡·≈–§«“¡
                  ‡ ¡Õ¿“§Õ¬à“ß·∑â®√‘ß À≈“¬¡≈√—∞„π À√—∞Õ‡¡√‘°“‰¥â®—¥∑”§Ÿà¡◊Õ‡æ◊ËÕ§«“¡‡ªìπ∏√√¡¥â“π‡æ»¿“«–
                  „π»“≈¬ÿμ‘∏√√¡ ‡™àπ



                                ë Shafran, Lynn Hecht and Norma J. Wickler, Gender Fairness in the Courts:

                                  Action in the New Millennium „π‚§√ß°“√¢Õß National Judicial Education
                                  Program (2001) ´÷Ë߇ªìπ‚§√ß°“√¢Õß NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund
                                  ∑’Ë√à«¡¡◊Õ°—∫ ¡“§¡ºŸâæ‘æ“°…“À≠‘ß·Ààß™“μ‘  (National Association of Women

                                  Judges)†π”‡ πÕ§Ÿà¡◊Õ¥â“π¬ÿ∑∏»“ μ√å∑’Ë¡’‡π◊ÈÕÀ“‡°’ˬ«°—∫Õß§åª√–°Õ∫ ”§—≠„π°“√
                                  ∫√√≈ÿ·≈–√–¡—¥√–«—ß„Àâ¡’§«“¡‡ªìπ∏√√¡¥â“π‡æ»¿“«–„π»“≈ ·≈–‡ √‘¡ √â“ß§«“¡‡¢â¡·¢Áß

                                  „Àâ°—∫§≥–∑”ß“π¢®—¥Õ§μ‘∑“߇滿“«–·≈–°“√∑”ß“π¢Õß§≥–°√√¡“∏‘°“√„À⇪ìπ
                                  Àπ૬∑”ß“πªØ‘√Ÿª·≈–∫Ÿ√≥“°“√§«“¡Àà«ß„¬‡√◊ËÕß§«“¡‡ªìπ∏√√¡¥â“π‡æ»¿“«–‡¢â“‰«â
                                  „π°“√«“ß·ºπß“π·≈–°“√√‘‡√‘Ë¡ªØ‘√Ÿª»“≈













                  9
                    Ryan v. Commûn on Judicial Performance (1988) 45Cal.3d 518
                  10                  th
                    Gordon (1996) 13 Cal.4  472
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26