Page 97 - The davide court : บทบาทของศาลยุติธรรมกับความเป็นธรรมด้านเพศภาวะในการพิจารณาพิพากษาคดี
P. 97
Davide Court : ∫∑∫“∑¢Õß»“≈¬ÿµ‘∏√√¡°—∫§«“¡‡ªìπ∏√√¡¥â“π‡æ»¿“«–„π°“√æ‘®“√≥“æ‘æ“°…“§¥’ 95
¿“§ºπ«° °.
§¥’‡°’ˬ«°—∫§«“¡‰√⧫“¡ “¡“√∂∑“ß®‘µ„®
(¢âÕ 36 ·Ààߪ√–¡«≈°ÆÀ¡“¬§√Õ∫§√—«)
§”æ‘æ“°…“»“≈Æ’°“∑’˪√–∏“π»“≈Æ’°“¡’ à«π√à«¡*
Division, Davide
Title of Case Nature of the Case SC Decision
Ponente Opinion
Salita vs. Petition for review on First, Decision Concur
Magtoils certiorari questioning Bellosillo of CA is
G.R.No.106429 resolution of CA denying affirmed
June 13, 1994 due course to the petition
for declaration of nullity of
marriage because of
procedural requirements
Krohn vs. CA Petition for review of CA First, Decision Concur
And krohn decision which affirmed the Bellosillo of CA is
G.R.No.108854 order of RTC in admitting affirmed
June 14, 1994 the Confidential
Psychiatric Evaluation report
in a petition for the
declaration of nullity of
marriage
* „π∞“π–∑’ˇªìπ ¡“™‘°¢Õß·ºπ° À√◊Õª√–∏“π»“≈Æ’°“
