Page 76 - The davide court : บทบาทของศาลยุติธรรมกับความเป็นธรรมด้านเพศภาวะในการพิจารณาพิพากษาคดี
P. 76

74        Davide Court : ∫∑∫“∑¢Õß»“≈¬ÿµ‘∏√√¡°—∫§«“¡‡ªìπ∏√√¡¥â“π‡æ»¿“«–„π°“√æ‘®“√≥“æ‘æ“°…“§¥’





                         APJR ‰¥â¥”‡π‘π‚§√ß°“√À≈“¬Ê Õ¬à“ß§«∫§Ÿà‰ª°—∫Àÿâπ à«π‡æ◊ËÕ°“√æ—≤π“ΩÉ“¬µÿ≈“°“√´÷Ëß¡ÿàß¡—Ëπ
                 ∑’Ë®–„Àâ¡’§«“¡√à«¡¡◊Õ°—π„π‡√◊ËÕß°“√∫Ÿ√≥“°“√¥â“π‡æ»¿“«–·≈–ª√–‡¥ÁπÕ◊ËπÊ  ‚§√ß°“√¥—ß°≈à“«‰¥â¥”‡π‘π°“√

                 ª√–‡¡‘π¡‘µ‘∑“߇滿“«–‡æ◊ËÕ„Àâ·πà„®«à“ª√–‡¥Áπ∑“߇滿“«–‰¥â√—∫°“√æ‘®“√≥“Õ¬à“ß‡æ’¬ßæÕ  µ—«Õ¬à“ß
                 ª√–°“√Àπ÷Ëß ‰¥â·°à ‚§√ß°“√°“√ π—∫ πÿπ‡æ◊ËÕ°“√√‘‡√‘Ë¡ªØ‘√Ÿªµÿ≈“°“√ (The Judicial Reform Initiative
                 Support (JURIS) Project)  ´÷Ë߉¥â√—∫°“√ π—∫ πÿπ∑“ß°“√‡ß‘π®“°Õß§å°√æ—≤π“√–À«à“ߪ√–‡∑»·Ààߪ√–‡∑»
                 ·§π“¥“ (The Canadian International Development Agency À√◊Õ CIDA)‰¥â‡√’¬°√âÕß„Àâ∫√√®ÿ
                 °“√«“ß·ºπ°“√µÕ∫ πÕ߇™‘ß¡‘µ‘∑“߇滿“«–‰«â„π·ºπ°“√»÷°…“¢Õß ∂“∫—π°“√»÷°…“µÿ≈“°“√·Ààߪ√–‡∑»

                 øî≈‘ªªîπ å (The Philippine Judicial Academy À√◊Õ PHILJA) Õ’°µ—«Õ¬à“ßÀπ÷Ë߉¥â·°à ‚§√ß°“√ π—∫ πÿπ
                 °“√ªØ‘√Ÿªµÿ≈“°“√ (The Judicial Reform Support Project À√◊Õ JRSP) ∑’ˉ¥â√—∫∑ÿπ π—∫ πÿπ®“°∏π“§“√‚≈°
                 Àÿâπ à«π‡æ◊ËÕ°“√æ—≤π“Õ’°À≈“¬·Ààß ‰¥â·°à  ‚§√ß°“√æ—≤π“·Ààß Àª√–™“™“µ‘  (UNDP) ∏π“§“√‡æ◊ËÕ°“√

                 æ—≤π“·Àà߇Շ™’¬ (ADB) Õß§å°√·Ààߪ√–‡∑» À√—∞Õ‡¡√‘°“‡æ◊ËÕ°“√æ—≤π“√–À«à“ߪ√–‡∑» (USAID)
                 ·≈– À¿“æ¬ÿ‚√ª (EU) ‰¥âª√–°“»æ—π∏– —≠≠“∑’Ë®–∫√√®ÿ„π‡√◊ËÕß GAD ·≈–∫Ÿ√≥“°“√‡æ»¿“«–‡¢â“‰ª
                 „π‚§√ß°“√µà“ßÊ ∑’ËÀπ૬ߓπ‡À≈à“π’È„Àâ°“√ π—∫ πÿπ


                         „π™à«ß‡«≈“‡¥’¬«°—ππ’ȇÕß »Ÿπ¬å µ√’»÷°…“·Ààß¡À“«‘∑¬“≈—¬øî≈‘ªªîπ å  (The University of the

                 Philippines Center for Womenûs Studies À√◊Õ UPCWS) √à«¡°—∫»Ÿπ¬å°ÆÀ¡“¬ (The Law Center)
                 ¢Õß¡À“«‘∑¬“≈—¬‡¥’¬«°—π ‰¥â¥”‡π‘π‚§√ß°“√«‘®—¬‡æ◊ËÕ°“√§âπÀ“√Ÿª·∫∫ ª√“°Ø°“√≥å ·≈–¢Õ∫‡¢µ¢ÕßÕ§µ‘
                 ∑“߇滿“«–„π√–∫∫»“≈   §≥–ºŸâ«‘®—¬´÷Ë߉¥â∑∫∑«π«√√≥°√√¡∑—Èß„πª√–‡∑»·≈–µà“ߪ√–‡∑»Õ¬à“ß§√Õ∫§≈ÿ¡

                 ‰¥â∑”°“√«‘‡§√“–Àå‡Õ° “√∫“ßÕ¬à“ߢÕß»“≈ ·≈–∑∫∑«π¢âÕ∫—ß§—∫·≈–°√–∫«π«‘∏’æ‘®“√≥“§«“¡¢Õß»“≈
                 ‡æ◊ËÕ§âπ«à“ ‘Ëßµà“ßÊ ‡À≈à“π’ȵÕ∫ πÕßµàÕ§«“¡®”‡ªìπ‚¥¬‡©æ“–·≈– ∂“π°“√≥åÕ—π‡≈«√⓬¢Õß µ√’·≈–‡¥Á°
                 Õ¬à“߉√


                         ß“π«‘®—¬¥—ß°≈à“«‰¥â√—∫°“√µ’æ‘¡æå‡ªìπÀπ—ß ◊Õ™◊ËÕ«à“ °“√§”π÷ß∂÷ß¡‘µ‘∑“߇滿“«–„π√–∫∫»“≈ (Gender

                 Sensitivity in the Court System) ´÷Ë߬◊π¬—π«à“ çÕ§µ‘∑“߇滿“«–π—Èπ°√–®“¬Õ¬Ÿà∑ÿ°Õ≥Ÿ¢Õß√–∫∫»“≈
                 „πÀ≈“¬ª√–‡∑» √«¡∑—Èߪ√–‡∑»øî≈‘ªªîπ å¥â«¬ (Feliciano and Sobritchea et al., 2002: 171-172)
                 ·≈–ß“π«‘®—¬¬—ß¡’¢âÕ‡ πÕ·π–‡ªìπ°“√‡©æ“–µàÕ»“≈Æ’°“‰«â¥—ßπ’È §◊Õ



                         „Àâ§«“¡ ”§—≠°—∫§«“¡‰¡à·πàπÕπ„π§”æ‘æ“°…“»“≈Æ’°“∑—ÈßÀ≈“¬ ‚¥¬‡©æ“–„π§¥’¢à¡¢◊π
                 ´÷Ëß®”‡ªìπµâÕß √â“ß§«“¡™—¥‡®π·≈–‰¥â√—∫°“√·°â‰¢
                         æ‘®“√≥“∑∫∑«πº≈¢Õß§”æ‘æ“°…“„π§¥’ People vs. Genosa (G.R. No. 135981, September
                 29, 2000) ∑’Ë»“≈‰¥â«‘π‘®©—¬«à“ °≈ÿà¡Õ“°“√¿√√¬“∑’Ë∂Ÿ°∑ÿ∫µ’‡ªìπ°√≥’‡¥’¬«°—π°—∫§«“¡«‘°≈®√‘µ

                         ∫—≠≠—µ‘¢âÕ∫—ß§—∫‡æ◊ËÕ„Àâ¡’°“√∫—ß§—∫µ“¡∫∑∫—≠≠—µ‘«à“¥â«¬°“√§ÿâ¡§√Õ߇À¬◊ËÕ°“√¢à¡¢◊π (rape shield)
                 ·Ààß Republic Act No. 8505 Õ¬à“߇À¡“– ¡ ‡æ◊ËÕ¡‘„ÀâºŸâæ‘æ“°…“„™âæ√–√“™∫—≠≠—µ‘œ ¥—ß°≈à“«
                 æ‘®“√≥“∂÷ß∫ÿ§≈‘°≈—°…≥–¢ÕߺŸâ‡ ’¬À“¬„π∞“𖇪ìπæ¬“πÀ≈—°∞“π„π§¥’¢à¡¢◊π ·≈–

                         ∫—≠≠—µ‘¢âÕ∫—ß§—∫‡æ◊ËÕ°“√∫—ß§—∫µ“¡æ√–√“™∫—≠≠—µ‘«à“¥â«¬»“≈§√Õ∫§√—« §.». 1997 (The Family
                 Courts Act of 1997) ‡æ◊ËÕ à߇ √‘¡„Àâ¡’°√–∫«π«‘∏’æ‘®“√≥“§«“¡∑’˧”π÷ß∂÷ß¡‘µ‘∑“߇滿“«–„π»“≈
                 §√Õ∫§√—«‡À≈à“π’È
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81