Page 35 - Rights beautiful : collection of Professor Saneh Chamarik
P. 35

Rights Beautiful Collection of Professor Saneh Chamarik


                                       They are by no means the eternal heritage of an original cultural
                                       endowment of Europe.  4
                                       On this account, all the ambivalence should now be put to rest
                                as to the current controversy about both cultural essentialism and
                                relativism. The one, Western claiming monopoly of the definition on
                                human rights; while another, non-Western denying the fundamental
                                universality of human rights, i.e., human life and dignity. The two, thus
                                far, can only indulge in self-styled polemics and actually get us nowhere
                                in terms of human progress, to be here defined as freedom from domination
                                                                             5
                                according to W.F. Wertheim’s Emancipation Principle.  As a matter of fact,
                                both human freedom and human progress simply constitute two sides
                                of the same coin. One cannot do without the other. The inclusive “four
                                freedoms” – freedom of expression, religious freedom, freedom from want,
                                freedom from fear – that Franklin D. Roosevelt advocated towards the
                                end of World War II underlying the vision of peace, security and human
                                rights, are basically along the same line of thinking. As we all well remember,
                                it is this global vision that brought about the establishment of the United
                                Nations and subsequently the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
                                From then on, the world body takes upon itself the major task of gradually
                                and persistently expanding and broadening the scope of human rights
                                even further. And it is still going on fairly consistently, in spite of its
                                inherent weaknesses and limitations, both legal and operational, as
                                international organization. But at the very least, it can afford to provide a
                                certain legitimate democratic groundwork for the rights holders, the people,
                                to work their way out with a moral support of global public opinion.
                                Fortunately enough, the subject matter of bio-diversity and indigenous


                                4
                                 Heiner Bielefeld, “WESTERN VERSUS ISLAMIC HUMAN RIGHTS CONCEPTION? A
                                 Critique of Cultural Essentialism in the Discussion of Human Rights”, Political Theory,
                                 vol. 28, No. 1, February 2000, pp. 96-97.
                                5
                                 W.F. Wertheim, Evolution and Revolution: The Rising Wave of Emancipation, Middlesex:
                                 Penguin Books, 1974, p. 47.
                                OFFICE OF THE NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF THAILAND  29
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40