Page 124 - ประมวลสรุปความรู้เกี่ยวกับพิธีสารอิสตันบูลและพิธีสารมินนิโซตา
P. 124

ISTANBUL PROTOCOL                                              IV.  GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR INTERVIEWS




                    or presence of police or third parties during the   longer to conduct and that medico-legal affidavits
                    evaluation;                                   may be many pages in length. If time is limited,
                                                                  clinicians should endeavour to elicit the most critical
                    (ii) A detailed record of the subject’s       information in accordance with the Istanbul Protocol
                    allegations, including torture or ill-treatment   and its Principles and report the time limitation.
                    methods and all complaints of physical and
                    psychological symptoms;                   357.  A detailed clinical evaluation of cases in which
                                                                  torture or ill-treatment is alleged or suspected
                    (iii) A record of all physical and psychological   includes a number of components, many of which
                    findings on clinical examination, including   are common to assessments of both physical and
                    appropriate diagnostic tests, body diagrams to   psychological evidence. The following guidance
                    record the location and nature of all injuries   on interview content focuses on common
                    (see annex III) and, where possible, colour   components of clinical evaluations. Additional
                    photographs of all injuries;                  guidance on the clinical evaluations of physical and
                                                                  psychological evidence of torture or ill-treatment
                    (iv) An interpretation as to the probable     is included in chapters V and VI respectively.
                    relationship of the physical and psychological
                    findings to possible torture or ill-treatment;  1.  Introduction and identification

                    (v) A recommendation for any necessary medical   358. Interviews for clinical evaluations usually begin with
                    and psychological treatment and/or further    examiners introducing themselves followed by:
                    examination;
                                                                  (a) An explanation of the purpose of the evaluation
                    (vi) Identification and signature of the evaluating   and the role of the interviewer as an examiner rather
                    clinician(s).                                 than a treating clinician;


            355. It is important to note that the Istanbul Principles   (b) A review of the conditions of the evaluation:
                apply to clinical evaluations in legal and non-legal
                contexts with one exception – that clinical evaluations   (i) Independence of the evaluator or lack thereof;
                in non-legal contexts do not require an interpretation
                of the level of consistency between the clinical findings   (ii) Confidentiality of the clinician’s findings
                and the allegations of torture or ill-treatment or an   and any applicable limits, such as mandatory
                opinion on the possibility of torture (see para. 635   reporting requirements;
                below). Nevertheless, in these non-legal contexts,
                clinicians who have knowledge and experience of       (iii) Right to refuse to answer questions or
                applying the Istanbul Protocol and its Principles     participate in examinations;
                should still consider providing an interpretation of
                the level of consistency between the clinical findings   (iv) Importance of detail and accuracy of
                and the alleged method(s) of injury, as well as an    information;
                opinion on the possibility of torture or ill-treatment
                as defined in the Convention against Torture.         (v) Possible difficulty of recalling certain events
                                                                      and potential for retraumatization and emotional
            356. The Istanbul Protocol includes minimum standards     reactions;
                for the State’s obligation to effectively investigate
                torture and ill-treatment, which are articulated in   (vi) Ability to take breaks;
                the Istanbul Principles and further elaborated in
                the present manual. The Istanbul Protocol and its     (vii) Access to refreshments and toilet facilities;
                Principles provide detailed guidance to clinicians who
                conduct medico-legal evaluations, which should be   (c) A statement on the overall content of the evaluation
                applied in accordance with a reasonable assessment of   including: detailed questions on events before during
                available resources and clinical judgment (see annex   and after the alleged torture or ill-treatment, followed
                IV). It is important to understand that comprehensive   by a physical and psychological examination, should
                clinical evaluations typically take several hours or   this be the case, and the possibility of photographs;




            84
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129