Page 128 - ประมวลสรุปความรู้เกี่ยวกับพิธีสารอิสตันบูลและพิธีสารมินนิโซตา
P. 128

ISTANBUL PROTOCOL                                              IV.  GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR INTERVIEWS




                (r) Solitary confinement and other forms of isolation;  includes: (a) methods of assessment; (b) current
                                                                  psychological complaints; (c) pre-torture history;
                (s) Sensory overload, such as loud music, bright lights   (d) post-torture history; (e) past psychological/
                and prolonged interrogations;                     psychiatric history; (f) substance abuse history; (g) a
                                                                  mental status examination; (h) an assessment of social
                (t) Exhaustion from prolonged, forced exercise often in   functioning; (i) psychological testing, if indicated;
                combination with sleep deprivation;               and (j) neuropsychological testing, if indicated.

                (u) Humiliation, guilt and shame, often resulting from   374.  In assessing the health consequences of torture
                verbal abuse and the performance of humiliating acts   and ill-treatment, it is important to consider and
                on the basis of one’s identity, gender and/or (actual or   to probe into the interrelationship between the
                presumed) sexual orientation;                     physical, psychological and social consequences
                                                                  of ill-treatment. For example, beatings may
                (v) Threats of death, harm to family, further torture,   result in chronic musculoskeletal pain, which
                imprisonment and mock executions; or attacks by   in turn can trigger terrifying memories, which
                animals, such as dogs, cats, rats or scorpions;   in turn results in social isolation. Such probing
                                                                  can provide a more complete picture of the ill-
                (w) Psychological techniques to break down the    effects of torture or ill-treatment suffered.
                individual, including forced betrayals, amplifying
                feelings of helplessness, exposure to ambiguous   7.   Closing and indications for referral
                situations or contradictory messages and violation
                of taboos;                                    375.  To conclude an evaluation, clinicians should
                                                                  review the next steps in the process of medico-legal
                (x) Behavioural coercion, such as forced engagement   documentation, for example forwarding a copy of their
                in practices against the religion of the victim (e.g.   reports to an individual’s lawyer or recommending
                forcing Muslims to eat pork), forced harm to others   additional tests or consultations. Clinicians should
                through torture or other abuses, forced destruction of   consider acknowledging the emotional difficulty
                property, and forced betrayal of someone placing them   of the interview, thank interviewees for their time
                at risk of harm;                                  and effort, and address any ongoing concerns or
                                                                  disabilities by making appropriate referrals. The
                (y) Manipulation of affect and emotions;          emotional state of the interviewee should be assessed
                                                                  and clinicians should take steps to mitigate signs of
                (z) Forcing victims to witness torture or atrocities being   stress. Clinicians have an ethical obligation to make
                inflicted on others, including members of their families.  appropriate referrals for medical and psychological
                                                                  services if needed, particularly if there is a risk of
            6.  Assessments of physical and psychological         self-harm or suicide. During psychological evaluations,
                evidence                                          clinicians may have reassured individuals that their
                                                                  symptoms are normal reactions to extreme experiences.
            373.  When the evaluation of an alleged victim is conducted   This is particularly helpful when individuals feel
                by more than one clinician, for example one for   that their symptoms are a sign of “going crazy”.
                physical evidence and another for psychological   Clinicians may consider reviewing this point with
                evidence, the content of the interview should focus   the individual at the end of the interview. Clinicians
                on the information most relevant to the clinician’s   should also discuss how the interview and examination
                expertise. Chapters V and VI provide detailed     process may exacerbate psychological symptoms.
                guidance on these evaluations. In summary, the
                evaluation of physical evidence includes: (a) a review   376.  When clinicians detect evidence of torture or
                of acute and chronic symptoms and disabilities; (b)   ill-treatment, they have legal and ethical obligations
                a thorough physical examination; (c) diagnostic   to report such evidence to the appropriate authorities.
                studies and clinical consultations, if indicated; (d)   As discussed in chapter II (see paras. 174–182
                the use of anatomical diagrams (see annex III) and   above), the decision to report clinical evidence of
                photographic documentation to describe physical   torture or ill-treatment ultimately should rest on the
                findings; and (e) an assessment of functional     informed consent of the alleged victim. Statutory
                disability. The psychological evaluation typically   law may require clinicians to report evidence of




            88
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133