Page 185 - เพศวิถีในคำพิพากษา

√“¬ß“π°“√«‘®—¬‡√◊ËÕ߇滫‘∂’„π§”æ‘æ“°…“ 177

Long Term Research Why ■ There is no practice
What ■ Member State compliance with CEDAW: The judiciary:
Judicial decisions (supreme court)
Where ■ Thailand

Who ■ Judicial Research Institute, Universities, Womenûs NGOs
How ■ Team Research-Planning/Training on CEDAW, Design, Con-
duct, Analysis
When ■ 2008-2009
Diplomatic Support Why ■ The issues are relevant to all above groups
Building What ■ Networking, Building alliance among judicial members,
womenûs rights groups, academics(forming gender justice
network); Training, Seminar, publication, public forum
Where ■ Bangkok, regions of Thailand

Who ■ Judges, activists, academics, lawyers, media
How ■ Identify target groups and division of work, brainstorm, plan,
implement
When ■ 2009
Resource Faculty Why ■ Exposure to new information, more comprehensive
Development/Resource analytical tools
Team meeting What ■ Colloquium, Training, Field visits, dialogues with

stakeholders, tribunal, mock trial; International standards
of human rights, womenûs human rights
Where ■ Bangkok and regions of Thailand
Who ■ Judicial Members, activists, academics, lawyers, media
How ■ Colloquium, Training, field visits, Dialogues with
stakeholders, tribunal, mock trial
When ■ 2009
Regional meeting Why ■ To have a broader perspective on the existing judicial
systems and cooperate with the progressive gender justice

network in the region
What ■ Judicial Members, civil society, academics in Asia Pacific
comparing civil and common law systems; Sharing
experiences and challenges in the process to comply with
CEDAW
Where ■ Successful common law and civil law countries in
Asia-Pacific

Who ■ Judicial members, civil society, academics in Asia Pacific