Page 162 - เพศวิถีในคำพิพากษา
P. 162

154                                                         √“¬ß“π°“√«‘®—¬‡√◊ËÕ߇滫‘∂’„π§”æ‘æ“°…“







                     3. Gender Equality and Judicial Decisions. The Case of Thailand by Somchai
                        Preechasilapakul (Assistant Professor and Dean of Faculty of Law, Chiang Mai
                        University, Thailand)



               He presented the findings of his research on gender equality in Thailandùs Supreme
               Court decisions. According to him, it is widely believed that court decisions are neutral
               and treat women and men equally in Thailand. However, when court decisions are examined
               regarding the crime of rape in Thailand during the past 50 years, we might doubt it.


               Rape is a crime under the Thai criminal code, yet, the courtûs reasoning on what
               constitutes rape is still problematic. Thai courts consider that consent is a very important
               factor. Nonetheless, most cases do not have clear evidence or witnesses so that it is
               difficult to prove whether such sexual incidents were consented to or forced.



               Three main factors that courts consider in determining whether the case is referred as rape
               or consensual sex is evidence of wounds, time, and the victimûs background:


                             ■ Wound: If a woman has a wound, it proves that she was struggling against
                                forced sex. Also, complaints from women who have wounds are considered
                                more reliable in the justice system. Following this logic, if a woman does not

                                have a wound, it is difficult to prove the rape case.
                             ■ Time: The length of time after the incident had occurred before victims
                                take any action is used to prove whether it is a rape case or not.
                                These actions include revealing the incident to police, doctors or friends.
                                If the victim waits too long before taking such actions, her testimony is
                                seen less credible.
                             ■ Victimûs background : the court uses the personal background of the victim
                                to determine if there was an intimate relationship between the victim
                                and the suspect. It implies that if there had been a consensual sex between

                                the two in the past, this could repeat.


               These three factors above that courts consider in determining whether the case is referred
               as rape or consensual sex, narrows down the definition of rape and do not take into consideration
               the dynamics and complexities around the rape incident. Individual victimsû experience,
               feelings and emotions are so different that they might respond to sexual violence differently.
               By taking no account of these factors, the incident has less of a chance to be identified as a rape

               case. The harder the rape case to be proved, the lesser other types of sexual abuses to be
               considered as a crime.
   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167