Page 633 - รายงานวิจัยฉบับสมบูรณ์ เรื่อง กฎหมายว่าด้วยความเสมอภาคและการไม่เลือกปฏิบัติ
P. 633
609
Tsesis, A. (2002). Destructive Messages : How Hate Speech Paves the Way for Harmful
Social Movement. NYU Press.
Umbarkar, P. P. (2014, March). Free Speech and Hate Speech Syndrome : Unprincipled
Animate in Media. Online International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 4.
UN Committee on Economic. Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). General Comment No. 16:
The Equal Right of Men and Women to the Enjoyment of All Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights (Art. 3 of the Covenant), 11 August 2005, E/C.12/2005/4.
United Nations Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner. (2012). Conscientious
Objection to Military Service. New York and Geneva.
Van Dijk, P., Van Hoof, F., Van Rijn, A., & Zwaak, L. (Eds.). (2006). Theory and Practice of the
European Convention on Human Rights (4th ed.). Antwerpen: Intersentia.
Virginia v. Black. "A State may choose to prohibit only those forms of intimidation that are
most likely to inspire fear of bodily harm." 538 U.S. 343 (2003).
Vorchheirner v. School District of Philadelphia 430 U.S. 703 (1977).
Weaver, R. L., & Partlett, D. F. (2005). Defamation, Free Speech, and Democratic
Governance. New York Law School Law Review, 50(57), 57.
Weintraub-Reiter, R. (1998). Hate Speech over the internet : A Traditional Constitutional
Analysis or a new cyber constitution? Boston University Public Interest Law Journal,
8.
Williams, M. S. (1996). Memory, History and Membership: The Moral Claims of Marginalized
Groups in Political Representation. In J. Räikkä (Ed.), Do We Need Mionrity Rights?
Conceptual Issues. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff.
Williams, M. S. (1998). Voice. Trust. and Memory : Marginalized groups and the Failings of
liberal representation. Princeton University Press.
World Health Organization/UNICEF. (2003). Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child
Feeding Geneva: World Health Organization.
Wright, G. R. (2006). Dignity and Conflicts of Constitutional Values:The Case of Free Speech
and Equal Protection. San Diego Law Review, 43, 527, 544–545.
ค าพิพากษาศาลต่างประเทศ
