Page 33 - รายงานผลการปฏิบัติงานคณะกรรมการสิทธิมนุษยชนแห่งชาติ ประจำปีงบประมาณ พ.ศ. 2560

1.4 Monitoring actions taken according to policy recommendations about improve-
ment of laws:
They can be divided into 72 reports of actions taken according to results of consideration with
policy recommendations before the fiscal year 2017 of which related agencies took actions according

to the policy recommendations and could conclude the monitoring work within this fiscal year and 49
per cent of them or 35 cases were right in the justice process, and 12 reports of actions according to
results of consideration with policy recommendations in the fiscal year 2017 of which 25 per cent or
3 cases were right to receive public health care service.

Details are given as examples of actions taken to protect human rights by the National Human
Rights Commission in the fiscal year 2017 in 19 cases as follows:
Case no.1 : Community right and right to participate in the management of natural resources and

environment in case of a claim that the Mineral Bill, B.E. .… affected human rights;
Case no.2 : Community right and right to occupational freedom in case of a claim that local
fishermen were affected by proclamation of the Fishery Decree, B.E. 2558 (2015);
Case no.3 : Community right in case of a claim that the Navigation in Thai Water Act (Issue

no.17), B.E. 2560 (2017) affected coastal communities and communities by the water;
Case no.4 : Community right in case of a claim that construction of Laem Yai Gas Depot and
pier of the gas depot affected the environment and occupations of Klong Noi community;
Case no.5 : Right to receive public health care service and welfare from the State in case of policy

and plan of actions to reduce disabilities by birth by requiring that Folic acid was a part of food ingredients;
Case no.6 : Right and liberty to occupation in case of a claim that the Security Business Act,
B.E. 2558 (2015)’s provisions about qualifications and prohibitions of security guards affected right and
liberty to occupation;

Case no.7 : Human dignity and right and liberty to body in case of the use of shackle in form
of foot padlock with 7 detainees who were in a student group called ‘The New Democracy Movement’
on 5 July 2016;
th
Case no.8 : Right in the justice process in case of a claim that inquiry officials were not fair in

performing their duties;
Case no.9 : Right in the justice process related to right to properties in case of a claim that
officers embezzled the property in dispute;
Case no.10 : Unfair discrimination in case of a claim that a school had forced students to

undergo a blood test to check HIV virus and used it as a condition for enrollment;
Case no.11 : Unfair treatment towards a person because of sex in case of a claim that students
who had gender identity different from their sex at birth had been forced to wear their hair and dress
according their sex at birth to attend classroom, take an examination, receive apprenticeship and attend

the degree conferring ceremony;
Case no.12 : Right of people with disabilities in case of a claim that the Distance Education Institute’s
announcement about enrollment of students at upper secondary level violated right of people with disabilities;

32 | รายงานผลการปฏิบัติงานคณะกรรมการสิทธิมนุษยชนแห่งชาติ ประจ�าปีงบประมาณ พ.ศ. ๒๕๖๐