Page 89 - ประมวลสรุปความรู้เกี่ยวกับพิธีสารอิสตันบูลและพิธีสารมินนิโซตา
P. 89

ISTANBUL PROTOCOL                                        III.  LEGAL INVESTIGATION OF TORTURE OR ILL-TREATMENT




                foreign nationals 350  and for refugees and stateless   inquiry or similar procedure. Members of such a
                persons); 351  (c) to lodge complaints in a timely   commission should be chosen for their recognized
                and confidential manner; 352  and (d) to have access   impartiality, competence and independence as
                to external judicial and monitoring bodies. 353    individuals. In particular, they must be independent
                “Complaints about torture should be recorded in   of any suspected perpetrators and the institutions or
                writing, and a forensic medical examination (including,   agencies that they may serve. The commission must
                if appropriate, by a forensic psychiatrist) should   have the authority to obtain all information necessary
                be immediately ordered.” 354  It is also in the public   to the inquiry and should conduct the inquiry as
                interest that any person is able to raise allegations   provided for under these principles. 358  A written
                of torture or ill-treatment, or report torture or   report, made within a reasonable time, must include
                ill-treatment, without the risk that such persons and   the scope of the inquiry, procedures and methods
                their relatives and legal representatives and human   used to evaluate evidence as well as the conclusions
                rights defenders are exposed to adverse consequences   and recommendations based on findings of fact and
                as a result of making and pursuing a complaint. 355    on applicable law. The publication of findings should
                                                                  be in accordance with the victims’ best interests.
            197.  Alleged victims of torture or ill-treatment and their   Therefore, it should take into account the duty of
                legal representatives must be informed of, and have   confidentiality in examinations and the risk for the
                access to, any hearing, as well as to all information   victims’ integrity as a result of the findings being
                relevant to the investigation, and must be entitled   made public. It must also describe in detail specific
                to present other evidence. Moreover, they must be   events that were found to have occurred and the
                able to challenge investigative measures, or the lack   evidence upon which such findings were based and
                thereof, before an independent body and, where    list the names of witnesses who testified with the
                necessary, be provided with legal aid. 356  Authorities   exception of those whose identities have been withheld
                must ensure the rights of victims to security, privacy   for their own protection. The State must, within a
                and physical and mental integrity, and take measures   reasonable period of time, reply to the report of the
                to minimize the risk of traumatization throughout   investigation and, as appropriate, indicate the steps
                the course of investigations and other relevant legal   to be taken in response (see paras. 238–251 below).
                proceedings. 357  In cases of investigating sexual violence
                or abuse of children or other vulnerable persons,   7.   Medical expert’s report
                the authorities should pursue an approach that fully
                takes into consideration the characteristics of victims   199.  Medical experts involved in the investigation of
                and the impact of the particular form of torture.  torture or ill-treatment should behave at all times
                                                                  in conformity with the highest ethical standards
            6.  Independent commission of inquiry                 and, in particular, must obtain informed consent
                                                                  before any examination is carried out. The
            198.  In cases in which the established investigative   examination must conform to established standards
                procedures are inadequate because of insufficient   of medical practice. In particular, examinations
                expertise or suspected bias, or because of the apparent   must be conducted in private under the control
                existence of a pattern of abuse, or for other substantial   of the medical expert and outside the presence of
                reasons, States must ensure that investigations are   security agents and other government officials.
                carried out through an independent commission of   The medical expert should promptly prepare




            350   Nelson Mandela Rules, rule 62 (1); Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment, principle 16 (2); and Vienna Convention
                on Consular Relations, art. 36 (1).
            351   Nelson Mandela Rules, rule 62 (2).
            352   Ibid., rules 56–57; Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment, principle 33 (1)–(3); and Svandize, Effective Investigations
                of Ill-Treatment, pp. 35–37.
            353   Nelson Mandela Rules, rule 56 (3); and Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment, principles 29 and 33 (4). See also
                Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Report on the Human Rights of Persons Deprived of Liberty in the Americas (2011), para. 254.
            354   A/62/221, para. 53 (a). See also Committee against Torture, general comment No. 3 (2012), para. 25.
            355   A/69/387, para. 55.
            356   Svandize, Effective Investigation of Ill-Treatment, p. 58, para. 4.5.1.
            357   Committee against Torture, general comment No. 3 (2012), para. 21; and Sara Ferro Ribeiro and Danaé van der Straten Ponthoz, International Protocol on the Documentation
                and Investigation of Sexual Violence in Conflict – Best Practice on the Documentation of Sexual Violence as a Crime or Violation of International Law, 2nd ed. (London,
                2017), p. 239, which lists the following strategies to mitigate retraumatization: (a) ensuring physical and emotional safety before, during and after interview; (b) promoting
                trustworthiness; (c) choice; (d) collaboration and participation; and (e) empowerment.
            358   Under certain circumstances professional ethics may require information to be kept confidential. These requirements should be respected.


            48
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94