Page 110 - ประมวลสรุปความรู้เกี่ยวกับพิธีสารอิสตันบูลและพิธีสารมินนิโซตา
P. 110

ISTANBUL PROTOCOL                                              IV.  GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR INTERVIEWS




            3.  Disclosure of sexual torture or ill-treatment     challenge it presents to a person’s gender identity and
                                                                  sexual orientation or the fear of “honour violence”
            274.  Disclosure of sexual torture or ill-treatment may be   from family or the community. There are unique
                so difficult that a person prefers not to talk about   difficulties for men, women and others in disclosing
                it at all or it may be disclosed only long afterwards   experiences of sexual violence. Gender norms are
                during therapy. 401  However, without disclosure of such   entrenched in most societies and both the victims’
                experiences, documentation will be incomplete and an   own ideas of their sexual orientation and gender
                assessment of resulting health-care needs compromised.   identity and the views of the society in which they
                It is important that individuals retain control over   live may be inextricably bound up in the impact of
                their disclosures to minimize retraumatization,   the sexual violence experience for them and influence
                especially as regards when, how much detail and to   disclosure. Sexual violence against men highlights the
                whom. A subjective assessment has to be made by   victim’s vulnerability and powerlessness, challenging
                the examiner about the extent to which pressing for   and conflicting with their ideas of masculinity.
                details is necessary for the effectiveness of the report   Perceptions of sexuality, procreative ability and
                in court. Clues indicating that a person has suffered   gender identity may also be challenged. 402  The
                sexual violence, but not disclosed it, may be found   response of submission or freezing, the association of
                by exploring gaps in their narrative of events or   male rape with homosexual pleasure and the lack of
                euphemisms, such as “they did what they wanted”. A   recognition and services for sexual violence against
                useful question to ask can be: “Did the officers ever   men may significantly affect disclosure in men. 403  In
                remove their clothes?” Clues in the psychological   women, social stigma and concerns about “losing
                examination may also raise concerns that sexual   one’s honour” and/or being outcast from the family
                violence has occurred but has not been disclosed, such   or community are often entrenched in societies
                as a history of compulsive washing many times a day,   and influence disclosure. Sexual violence against
                repeated self-harming behaviour and the nature of   homosexual individuals similarly has unique impacts
                trigger and avoidance behaviour relating to intrusive   on the victims and distinct challenges regarding
                recall and flashbacks of traumatic experiences.   disclosure that must be considered and mitigated.

            275.  Avoidance, a feature of post-traumatic stress disorder   4.  Risk of retraumatization of the interviewee
                (PTSD), may also inhibit disclosure. Clinicians need
                to be mindful of their own responses to a person’s   277.  Interviewers should be aware that clinical interviews
                disclosures and that they do not themselves also   and evaluations, including recounting past experiences
                avoid these important issues. Disclosure of sexual   of torture and severe trauma, as well as physical
                violence, even in the relatively safe setting of an   and psychological examination and common
                evaluation, may be intensely distressing and raise   procedures and ancillary diagnostic testing, such as
                the person’s risk of self-harm and suicide. A risk   blood tests, can be profoundly retraumatizing for
                assessment of harm to self and from others must be   victims, both during the examination and afterwards.
                made. If the disclosure is made for the first time in   Retraumatization refers to traumatic stress reactions
                the context of a medico-legal evaluation, the reasons   (emotional and/or physical) triggered by exposure
                for not previously making the disclosure should   to memories or reminders of past traumatic
                be discussed in the report. Victims may feel that   events. 404  During the evaluation, retraumatization
                others will judge them to be at fault for having put   can manifest as anxiety about the interview,
                themselves at risk in some way. They may feel that if   wanting to avoid discussing particular incidents,
                they have not been physically injured then they will   minimizing conversation, re-experiencing physical
                not be believed or be believed to have consented.  or emotional symptoms, symptoms of hyperarousal
                                                                  or insomnia, numbing of general responsiveness or
            276.  Disclosure of sexual violence may be inhibited by   becoming overwhelmed with memories and emotion.
                many factors, including the shame and fear evoked, the   Retraumatized individuals may mobilize strong



            401   Crime survey data from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland show that nearly 31 per cent of the rape victims had never disclosed their experience to
                anyone and approximately 83 per cent had not reported it to the police. Office for National Statistics, “Sexual offences in England and Wales: year ending March 2017”
                (London, 2018).
            402   UNHCR, “Working with men and boy survivors of sexual and gender-based violence in forced displacement” (Geneva, 2012), p. 4.
            403   Clayton M. Bullock and Mace Beckson, “Male victims of sexual assault: phenomenology, psychology, physiology”, Journal of American Academy of Psychiatry and Law,
                vol. 39, No. 2 (2011), pp. 197–205.
            404   Melanie P. Duckworth and Victoria M. Follette, eds, Re-traumatization: Assessment, Treatment, and Prevention (New York, Routledge, 2012), chap. 1.


            70
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115