Page 106 - ประมวลสรุปความรู้เกี่ยวกับพิธีสารอิสตันบูลและพิธีสารมินนิโซตา
P. 106

III.  LEGAL INVESTIGATION OF TORTURE OR ILL-TREATMENT                           ISTANBUL PROTOCOL




                secure the right of victims to an effective remedy   subjected to torture (or other human rights violations
                and reparation; 397  (c) truth commissions and other   amounting to persecution) – and adequately consider
                procedures established in the context of a transition   available evidence, particularly clinical evidence, in
                from repressive regimes and/or conflict; 398  and (d)   their decision-making. In particular, decision makers
                applications for asylum or non-refoulement. 399  In   must not adopt opinions on clinical matters for which
                situations in which no full investigation has been   they are not qualified and must not dismiss clinical
                carried out, any evidence submitted in relevant   evidence on the basis of having made a prior negative
                legal proceedings should be obtained by adhering   credibility finding. Clinical evidence of past torture
                to the Istanbul Protocol and its Principles.      or ill-treatment is typically a strong indicator of a
                                                                  real risk of persecution or torture upon return. 400
            265. Decision makers, particularly in asylum and      The lack of clinical evidence does not establish that
                refoulement cases, must apply the correct standard of   a person has not been tortured or that the claim
                proof – of a reasonable likelihood or real risk of being   of a person alleging torture lacks credibility.



























































            397   Committee against Torture, general comment No. 3 (2012), inter alia, para. 30: “States parties shall also make readily available to the victims all evidence concerning acts
                of torture or ill-treatment upon the request of victims, their legal counsel, or judge. A State party’s failure to provide evidence and information, such as records of medical
                evaluations or treatment, can unduly impair victims’ ability to lodge complaints and to seek redress, compensation and rehabilitation.”
            398   A/HRC/24/42.
            399   Committee against Torture, general comment No. 4 (2017), para. 18 (e).
            400   Ibid., para. 28.


                                                                                                          65
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111