Page 103 - ประมวลสรุปความรู้เกี่ยวกับพิธีสารอิสตันบูลและพิธีสารมินนิโซตา
P. 103

ISTANBUL PROTOCOL                                        III.  LEGAL INVESTIGATION OF TORTURE OR ILL-TREATMENT




            1.  Prosecutors                                       standards, investigation methods and developments. 381
                                                                  Prosecutors should exercise their discretion in a
            253. Prosecutors, in the administration of justice, “shall   manner that fully upholds the prohibition of torture
                perform an active role in criminal proceedings,   throughout any legal proceedings. They should not
                including institution of prosecution and, where   become complicit in the enabling or commission of acts
                authorized by law or consistent with local practice, in   of torture or ill-treatment or impunity for such acts.
                the investigation of crime, supervision over the legality
                of these investigations, supervision of the execution of   256. Upon receiving a complaint, or otherwise learning of
                court decisions and the exercise of other functions as   an allegation of torture or ill-treatment, prosecutors
                representatives of the public interest”. 376  In doing so,   should immediately take measures to ensure that a
                “prosecutors shall give due attention to the prosecution   prompt, impartial, effective and gender- and child-
                of crimes committed by public officials, particularly   sensitive investigation is carried out in accordance
                corruption, abuse of power, grave violations of human   with this manual. 382  Prosecutors should take or
                rights and other crimes recognized by international   request expeditious investigative measures to be
                law and, where authorized by law or consistent with   taken in accordance with this chapter. They should
                local practice, the investigation of such offences”. 377  open an investigation to this effect and in situations
                                                                  in which investigations are at any stage found to
            254. As a general principle, “prosecutors shall, in   have been inadequate in light of the standards set
                accordance with the law, perform their duties fairly,   out in this manual, the original investigation should
                consistently and expeditiously, and respect and   be reopened or a fresh investigation commenced.
                protect human dignity and uphold human rights,    Throughout proceedings, prosecutors should take all
                thus contributing to ensuring due process and the   possible measures to ensure the protection of victims
                smooth functioning of the criminal justice system”. 378    and witnesses. This includes instituting proceedings
                Prosecutors have a duty to refuse to take into account   against anyone who endangers the physical or
                evidence that they know or believe on reasonable   psychological integrity of victims or witnesses or
                grounds was obtained through recourse to torture or   others involved in investigations. Prosecutors should
                ill-treatment. They must ensure that any information,   seek to establish the responsibility of any officials
                confession or admission obtained from a person by   or other individuals involved in acts of torture or
                such means is inadmissible in evidence against that   ill-treatment and bring charges for the criminal
                person in any proceeding (the exclusionary rule).   offence of torture or ill-treatment, or relevant similar
                However, such evidence, information, confession   offences under national law, in situations in which
                or admission may be admitted against any person   sufficient evidence is available. In cases in which
                accused of torture as evidence that it was obtained by   insufficient evidence is available to bring charges of
                torture. 379  In such cases, prosecutors must inform the   torture or ill-treatment, prosecutors should consider
                court about the existence of such evidence and should   bringing charges for lesser crimes or recommending
                take all necessary steps to ensure that those responsible   disciplinary measures as appropriate. When requesting
                for using such methods are brought to justice. 380    punishment, particularly a custodial sentence,
                                                                  prosecutors must ensure that it is commensurate with
            255. Prosecutors must be professionally qualified and   the gravity of the offence, taking into consideration
                provided with regular training, adequate resources,   the rights and views of victims of torture or
                independence and protection to ensure that they can   ill-treatment and their families as appropriate.
                exercise their role in the context of investigations into
                alleged acts of torture or ill-treatment in accordance   2.  Judges
                with this manual. The prosecuting authorities should
                issue guidelines on the use of this manual and   257.  “An independent and impartial judiciary … and the
                prosecutors should receive regular training on relevant   integrity of the judicial system are prerequisites for




            376   Guidelines on the Role of Prosecutors, para. 11.
            377   Ibid., para. 15.
            378   Ibid., para. 12.
            379   See, in particular, Convention against Torture, art. 15.
            380   Guidelines on the Role of Prosecutors, para. 16.
            381   A/69/387, para. 67.
            382   CAT/C/54/2, para. 92.


            62
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108