Page 171 - ประมวลสรุปความรู้เกี่ยวกับพิธีสารอิสตันบูลและพิธีสารมินนิโซตา
P. 171

ISTANBUL PROTOCOL                                   VI.  PSYCHOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF TORTURE AND ILL-TREATMENT




                disturbance, reported symptoms are predominantly   Furthermore, PTSD does not conform to the classical
                cognitive in nature or a differential diagnosis between   paradigm of an analysis of identifiable brain lesions
                brain impairment and PTSD has to be made.         that can be confirmed by medical techniques. With
                                                                  an increased emphasis on and understanding of
            560. The selection of neuropsychological tests and    the biological mechanisms involved in psychiatric
                procedures is subject to the limitations specified above   disorders generally, neuropsychological paradigms
                and, therefore, cannot follow a standard battery   have been invoked more frequently than in the
                format, but rather must be case specific and sensitive   past. However, the findings so far are diverse and
                to individual characteristics. The flexibility required   thus not applicable for diagnostic purposes.
                in the selection of tests and procedures demands
                considerable experience, knowledge and caution on   563. There is great variability among the samples used
                the part of the examiner. As has been pointed out   for the study of neuropsychological measures in
                above, the range of instruments to be used will often   post-traumatic stress. This may account for the
                be limited to non-verbal tasks, and the psychometric   variability of the cognitive problems reported from
                characteristics of any standardized tests will most likely   these studies. It was pointed out that “clinical
                suffer when population-based norms do not apply to   observations suggest that PTSD symptoms show the
                an individual subject. An absence of verbal measures   most overlap with the neurocognitive domains of
                represents a very serious limitation. Many areas of   attention, memory and executive functioning”. 476  This
                cognitive functioning are mediated through language   is consistent with complaints heard frequently from
                and systematic comparisons between various verbal   torture survivors. Subjects describing difficulties in
                and non-verbal measures are typically used in order to   concentrating and feeling unable to retain information
                arrive at conclusions regarding the nature of deficits.  and engage in planned, goal-directed activity.

            561.  The choice of instruments and procedures in   564. Neuropsychological assessment methods appear
                neuropsychological assessments of alleged torture   able to identify the presence of neurocognitive
                victims must be left to the individual clinician, who will   deficits in PTSD, even though the specificity of these
                have to select them in accordance with the demands   deficits is more difficult to establish. Some studies
                and possibilities of the situation. Neuropsychological   have documented the presence of deficits in PTSD
                tests cannot be used properly without extensive   subjects when compared with normal controls
                training and knowledge in brain-behaviour         but they have failed to discriminate these subjects
                relations. Comprehensive lists of neuropsychological   from matched psychiatric controls. 477  In other
                procedures and tests and their proper application   words, it is likely that neurocognitive deficits on
                can be found in standard references. 475          test performances will be evident in cases of PTSD,
                                                                  but insufficient for diagnosing it. As in many other
            (c)  Post-traumatic stress disorder                   types of assessment, the interpretation of test results
                                                                  must be integrated into a larger context of interview
            562. The considerations offered above should make it   information. In that sense, specific neuropsychological
                clear that great caution is needed when attempting   assessment methods can make a contribution to
                neuropsychological assessment of brain impairment   the documentation of PTSD in the same manner
                in alleged torture victims. This must be even more   that they do for other psychiatric disorders
                strongly the case in attempting to document PTSD   associated with known neurocognitive deficits.
                in alleged victims through neuropsychological
                assessment. Even in the case of assessing PTSD subjects   565. Despite significant limitations, neuropsychological
                for whom population-based norms are available,    assessment may be useful in evaluating individuals
                there are considerable difficulties to consider. PTSD   suspected of having brain injury and in distinguishing
                is a psychiatric disorder and traditionally has not   brain injury from PTSD. Neuropsychological
                been the focus of neuropsychological assessment.   assessment may also be used to evaluate specific



            475   Esther Strauss, Elisabeth M.S. Sherman and Otfried Spreen, A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms and Commentary, 3rd ed. (New York,
                Oxford University Press, 2006).
            476   Jeffrey A. Knight, “Neuropsychological assessment in posttraumatic stress disorder”, in Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD, John P. Wilson and Terence M. Keane, eds.
                (New York, Guilford Press, 1997), pp. 448–492.
            477   John E. Dalton, Sanford L. Pederson and Joseph J. Ryan, “Effects of post-traumatic stress disorder on neuropsychological test performance”, International Journal of Clinical
                Neuropsychology, vol. 11, No. 3 (1989), pp. 121–124; and Tzvi Gil and others, “Cognitive functioning in post-traumatic stress disorder”, Journal of Traumatic Stress, vol. 3,
                No. 1 (1990), pp. 29–45.


            132
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176