Page 155 - ประมวลสรุปความรู้เกี่ยวกับพิธีสารอิสตันบูลและพิธีสารมินนิโซตา
P. 155

ISTANBUL PROTOCOL                                   VI.  PSYCHOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF TORTURE AND ILL-TREATMENT




            A.  General considerations                            is a means of attacking an individual’s fundamental
                                                                  modes of psychological and social functioning.
            1.  Central role of the psychological evaluation      Under such circumstances, the torturer strives not
                                                                  only to incapacitate a victim physically but also
            491.  It is a widely held view that torture is an extraordinary   to disintegrate the individual’s personality. 449  The
                life experience capable of causing a broad range of   torturer attempts to destroy a victim’s sense of being
                physical and psychological suffering. Research and   grounded in a family and society as a human being
                clinical experience have shown that psychological   with dreams, hopes and aspirations for the future. By
                sequelae of torture are often more persistent     dehumanizing and breaking the will of their victims,
                and protracted than physical sequelae 447  and    torturers offer a horrific warning for those who
                documentation of torture frequently takes place   later come in contact with the victim. In this way,
                when the physical lesions have already disappeared.   torture can break or damage the will and coherence
                These circumstances confer upon the psychological   of entire communities. In addition, torture can
                evaluation a central role in evidencing torture, holding   profoundly damage intimate relationships between
                perpetrators responsible and claiming redress. Most   spouses, parents, children, other family members
                clinicians and researchers agree that the extreme   and between the victims and their communities.
                nature of the torture event is powerful enough on its
                own to produce mental and emotional consequences,   493. It is important to recognize that not everyone who has
                regardless of the individual’s pre-torture psychological   been tortured develops a diagnosable mental illness. 450
                status. The psychological consequences of torture,   However, most victims experience profound emotional
                however, vary according to the nature of the harm   reactions and psychological symptoms often also
                inflicted and the context of personal attribution of   including serious cognitive and behavioural changes.
                meaning, personality development and social, political   The main psychiatric disorders associated with torture
                and cultural factors. For this reason, it cannot be   are PTSD and depression. While these disorders are
                assumed that all forms of torture have the same   present in the general population, their prevalence,
                consequences in every individual. For example, the   though varying among studies, is much higher among
                psychological consequences of a mock execution are   torture survivors. Epidemiological studies with
                not the same as those due to a sexual assault, and   torture survivors and refugees show prevalence rates
                solitary confinement and isolation are not likely to   of 23–88 per cent for PTSD and 28–95 per cent for
                produce the same effects as physical acts of torture.   depression. 451  The high variability among studies is
                Likewise, the effects of detention and torture on an   likely due to different population samples (including
                adult will usually not be the same as those on a child.   studies with torture survivors seeking treatment),
                Nevertheless, there are clusters of symptoms and   different assessment methods, coexisting stressors
                psychological reactions that have been observed and   and other factors. However, the unique cultural,
                documented in torture survivors with some regularity.  social and political implications that torture has for
                                                                  each individual influence the ability of that person to
            492. Perpetrators often attempt to justify their acts   describe and speak about it. Such effects on the victim’s
                of torture or ill-treatment by the need to gather   ability to make sense of and describe the experience of
                information. Such conceptualizations obscure the   torture must be considered especially when performing
                purpose of torture and its intended consequences.   an evaluation of an individual from another culture.
                One of the central aims of torture is to reduce an   Cross-cultural research reveals that phenomenological
                individual to a position of extreme helplessness and   or descriptive methods are the most useful approaches
                distress that can lead to a deterioration of cognitive,   when attempting to evaluate psychological or
                emotional and behavioural functions. 448  Thus, torture   psychiatric disorders. What is considered disordered






            447   José Quiroga and James M. Jaranson, “Politically-motivated torture and its survivors. A desk review of the literature”, Torture, vol. 15, No. 2–3 (2005).
            448   José A. Saporta and Bessel A. van der Kolk, “Psychobiological consequences of severe trauma”, in Torture and its Consequences: Current Treatment Approaches, Metin
                Başoğlu, ed. (Cambridge, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 151–181.
            449   Almerindo E. Ojeda, ed., The Trauma of Psychological Torture (Westport, Praeger, 2008); and Pau Pérez-Sales, Psychological Torture: Definition, Evaluation and Measurement
                (Routledge, 2016).
            450   It should be kept in mind that the qualification of an act as torture is not dependent on the existence of subsequent prolonged mental harm. See, in this respect, Manfred
                Nowak, “What practices constitute torture?: US and UN standards”, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 28, No. 4 (2006), pp. 809–841.
            451   Hiba Abu Suhaiban, Lana Ruvolo Grasser and Arash Javanbakht, “Mental health of refugees and torture survivors: a critical review of prevalence, predictors and integrated
                care”, International Journal on Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 16, No. 13 (2019).


            116
   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160