Page 152 - ประมวลสรุปความรู้เกี่ยวกับพิธีสารอิสตันบูลและพิธีสารมินนิโซตา
P. 152

V.  PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF TORTURE AND ILL-TREATMENT                              ISTANBUL PROTOCOL




                (c) Disruption of the rugal pattern may manifest as   F.  Specialized diagnostic tests
                smooth fan-shaped scarring. When these scars are seen
                out of midline (i.e. not at 12 or 6 o’clock), they can be   480. Diagnostic tests are not an essential part of the clinical
                an indication of penetrating trauma;              assessment of a person alleging torture or ill-treatment.
                                                                  In many cases, a medical history and physical
                (d) Skin tags, which can be the result of         examination are sufficient. There are circumstances
                healing trauma;                                   in which such tests are valuable supporting evidence,
                                                                  for example, in situations in which there is a legal
                (e) Purulent discharge from the anus. Cultures should   case against members of the authorities or a claim
                be taken for gonorrhoea and chlamydia in all cases   for compensation. However, it must be remembered
                of alleged rectal penetration, regardless of whether a   that any test will have a false negative rate and
                discharge is noted.                               this is often higher the greater the interval between
                                                                  performing the test and the time when the injury
            479.  Anal examinations are forcibly conducted in many   occurred. If diagnostic tests are performed for clinical
                countries in which consensual anal intercourse is   rather than legal reasons, the results should be added
                considered a criminal act. 442  They are conducted   to the clinical report. It must be recognized that the
                almost exclusively on males in an effort to “prove”   absence of a positive diagnostic test result, as with
                that they engage in “homosexual behaviour”. In a   physical findings, must not be used to suggest that
                statement made in 2016, the Independent Forensic   torture or ill-treatment did not occur. There are many
                Expert Group concluded that there was no clinical   situations in which diagnostic tests are not available
                validity in such a test. Such examinations are    for technical reasons, but their absence should never
                inherently discriminatory. In many circumstances in   invalidate an otherwise properly written report.
                which anal examinations are forcibly conducted, they
                are accompanied by other forms of physical torture or   481.  Diagnostic tests are being developed and evaluated
                ill-treatment, such as beatings by police and demeaning   all the time. For this reason, reference here to specific
                remarks about the individual’s alleged homosexuality   tests is limited, but when additional supporting
                by police and medical personnel. Threats, coercion   evidence is required, investigators should utilize
                and physical force are often applied. The fact that   the most up-to-date resources available to them.
                an examination may be conducted with non-medical
                personnel being present is an additional source of   482. In the acute phase of injury, various imaging
                concern. In addition, the elements of forced nudity   modalities may be useful in providing additional
                and physical restraint, when used, amplify the sense   documentation of skeletal and soft tissue injury.
                of helplessness, fear, humiliation and degradation that   Once the physical injuries of torture or ill-treatment
                individuals experience. The Committee against Torture,   have healed, however, the residual sequelae are
                the Special Rapporteur on torture and the Working   generally no longer detectable by the same imaging
                Group on Arbitrary Detention have stated that the   methods. This is often true even when survivors
                practice of forced anal examinations contravenes   continue to suffer significant pain or disability from
                the prohibition against torture and ill-treatment. 443    their injuries. In addition, the more sophisticated
                When anal examinations are forcibly conducted     and expensive technology may not be universally
                and involve anal penetration, the examination     available or at least not to a person in custody.
                should be considered a form of sexual assault and
                rape. Involvement of health professionals in these   483. MRI may detect bone contusion and stress or
                examinations violates the basic standards and ethics   occult fractures before it can be imaged by either
                of the relevant professions. Anal examinations carried   routine radiographs, CT or scintigraphy.
                out as body cavity checks should only be carried out
                in accordance with the Bangkok Rules (rules 19–21),   484. Use of open scanners and sedation may
                the Nelson Mandela Rules (rules 50–52) and the    alleviate anxiety and claustrophobia, which
                WMA statement on body searches of prisoners.      are prevalent among torture survivors.






            442   Independent Forensic Expert Group, “Statement on anal examinations” (see footnote 309), p. 85.
            443   A/HRC/19/41, para. 37. See also A/HRC/22/53, para. 79.


                                                                                                         113
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157