Page 149 - เพศวิถีในคำพิพากษา
P. 149

√“¬ß“π°“√«‘®—¬‡√◊ËÕ߇滫‘∂’„π§”æ‘æ“°…“                                                141






                                         The Summary of the Research on

                               Gender Bias in Thai Supreme Courtûs Decision
                                           Judicial Colloquium Workshop
                                 25-27 October 2007 at Chiangmai, Thailand
                        Presented by Asst.Professor Somchai Preechasinlapakun
                                  Dean of Law Faculty, Chiang Mai University



                                                     ________________________


                        1. Introduction
                        In Thailand, it is widely believed that the court decisions are straight › forward exercises of
                        rationality and legal logics free from personal value. Court decisions are neutral, no gender
                        bias in their decisions. This is conventional belief it is therefore understandable why Thai

                        lawyers, including academics, have been paying little attention to analyze Thai court decisions.
                        The role of the court is similar to legal machines.


                        My study is to raise the question on the mainstream belief by looking into court decisions in the
                        crime of rape during the past 50 years so as to find how the court define what consensual
                        or forced sex is, and what factors lead to the reduction or increase of punishment.


                        2. How Thai Court Interprets çConsensual Sexé on the Rape Case.

                        Although rape is a crime under Thai criminal code, the courtûs reasoning on what constitute rape
                        is still problematic.


                        Consent is very important issue in the courtûs consideration in the rape case. In most cases, male
                        defendant usually claimed that woman agreed to engage in sexual activity not by force, the plaintiff
                        usually expressed the opposite. Nonetheless, most cases do not have hard evidence or witness ›
                        incidents usually took place in places far away from eye witness such as at motels, houses, in the
                        jungle etc. Without any witness, it is difficult to prove whether such sexual incident fall in the

                        category of consensual sex or rape. The disputes are often çword against wordé.
                        The court usually relies on some specific reasoning to define what consensual rape is.


                        Based on Supreme Court decisions in the past 50 years, the study found that the court constructs
                        3 main factors constituting rape: A) wound B) duration of time when the incident is revealed to
                        others and C) victimsû background
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154