Page 67 - รายงานการปฏิบัติตามอนุสัญญาต่อต้านการทรมานและการประติบัติ หรือการลงโทษที่โหดร้ายไร้มนุษยธรรม หรือที่ย่ำยีศักดิ์ศรี
P. 67
14
20. Recommendation: The Government should review the enforcement
of the Martial Law Act and the Emergency Decree in the southern border
provinces. Such laws have provisions limiting the rights and freedom of
the people and should be used as necessary and for a limited period. In
an area where the situation has improved, the Government should
consider enforcing the Internal Security Act B.E.2551 (2008) which is less
restrictive of rights instead. The procedures for search, arrest, detention,
the formation of charges and investigation provided for in the Act are
similar to those under the Criminal Procedure Code and the Act contains
provisions that protect the rights of the accused person more in
accordance with international standards.
21. The NHRCT is of the view that the Decree on Public Administration in
an Emergency Situation does not provide for appropriate mechanism
against wrongful exercise of power by the executive and its officials.
Section 16 of the Decree stipulates that the announcements, orders or
actions carried out under the Decree are not within the jurisdiction of the
Administrative Court. In its judgment No.9/2553, the Constitutional Court
ruled that any person suffering an injury from regulatory orders or acts of
state officials under the Emergency Decree can bring the case to the Court
of Justice pursuant to the Section 218 of the Constitution of the Kingdom
of Thailand. However, the Constitution has provided for a dual court
system with the establishment of the Administrative Court to adjudicate
administrative cases separately from the Court of Justice. The Constitution
also requires that the Administrative Court uses the inquiry system as the
Court’s procedure to allow the private party, who is in a more
disadvantaged position than the state in an administrative case in terms of