Page 67 - รายงานการปฏิบัติตามอนุสัญญาต่อต้านการทรมานและการประติบัติ หรือการลงโทษที่โหดร้ายไร้มนุษยธรรม หรือที่ย่ำยีศักดิ์ศรี
P. 67

14




               20. Recommendation: The Government should review the enforcement

               of the Martial Law Act and the Emergency Decree in the southern border

               provinces.  Such laws have provisions limiting the rights and freedom of

               the people and should be used as necessary and for a limited period. In


               an  area  where  the  situation  has  improved,  the  Government  should

               consider enforcing the Internal Security Act B.E.2551 (2008) which is less

               restrictive of rights instead. The procedures for search, arrest, detention,


               the  formation  of  charges  and  investigation  provided  for  in  the  Act  are

               similar to those under the Criminal Procedure Code and the Act contains

               provisions  that  protect  the  rights  of  the  accused  person  more  in

               accordance with international standards.



               21. The NHRCT is of the view that the Decree on Public Administration in

               an  Emergency  Situation  does  not  provide  for  appropriate  mechanism


               against  wrongful  exercise  of  power  by  the  executive  and  its  officials.

               Section 16 of the Decree stipulates that the announcements, orders or

               actions carried out under the Decree are not within the jurisdiction of the

               Administrative Court. In its judgment No.9/2553, the Constitutional Court


               ruled that any person suffering an injury from regulatory orders or acts of

               state officials under the Emergency Decree can bring the case to the Court

               of Justice pursuant to the Section 218 of the Constitution of the Kingdom


               of  Thailand.  However,  the  Constitution  has  provided  for  a  dual  court

               system with the establishment of the Administrative Court to adjudicate

               administrative cases separately from the Court of Justice.  The Constitution

               also requires that the Administrative Court uses the inquiry system as the


               Court’s  procedure  to  allow  the  private  party,  who  is  in  a  more

               disadvantaged position than the state in an administrative case in terms of
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72